Skip to main content

Kayani’s War

By S. M. Hali
The war on terror has taken a heavy toll of more than 40,000 precious lives, cost the national exchequer more than 68 billion dollars and deprived cash starved Pakistan of millions of dollars worth of property, equipment and the armed forces of precious weapon systems like the P3C Orions or AEW&C aircraft. It is ironical that the doubting Thomas among us still question whether this is our war? Like ostriches we bury our heads in sand in the sight of clear & present danger from the terror attacks pretendinG this is not our war. Finally, when rather belatedly, on Independence Day 2012, the Chief of Army Staff in his address to the Pakistan Military Academy Kakul declared the war on terror to be Pakistan’s war, knives were out to assail his opinion. A number of TV anchors and columnists, in a state of shock rued that it was a misperception. Renowned columnist Khaled Ahmed, in his weekend Op-Ed ‘General Kayani’s war’ went to the extent of naming populist decisions by General Kayani, which according to him “were front-loaded with defiant challenge but were always followed by realistic retreat that appeared like cowardice to people.” He recounts the release of CIA operative Raymond Davis; his decision on May 2011 to feel “unrealistically enraged by the killing of Osama bin Laden in Abbotabad and turning on the government in power after it took the correct posture”; in response to the Salala incident on November 26, 2011, flying “off the handle and stopping the NATO supply route through Pakistan”. Khaled claims that  “Not only is the army openly in exclusive charge of the country’s foreign and security policy, it is clearly the real power in Pakistan behind the façade of democracy”. Blaming the Army Chief for letting the Difa-e-Pakistan Council loose on the country after his own volte-face on the NATO route, the erudite scholar concludes that “General Kayani is thus the most powerful man in the country, paradoxically enjoying the reputation of an army chief who believes in non-interference in the democratic process.”
These detractors of Pakistan do not wholeheartedly participate in the war on terror with the plea that it is the sole domain of Pakistan Army, forgetting that it is a national effort.  Those elements blaming the Army, as an institution to have absolute control on its direction and conduct are highly misinformed. It was the Parliamentary Committee on National Security, none of whose members belong to any of the armed forces, that after long deliberations, came to the informed decision that the rules of engagement with the US need to be redrawn, drone attacks must cease and Pakistan needs to revisit the concessions regarding the Ground Lines of Communication (GLOC), commonly known as NATO supply routes.
It must be understood that the elimination of terrorism, anywhere in Pakistan is the nation’s responsibility. Decisions have to be taken by the civilian government after weighing all options. Whether in Karachi or in NWA (North Waziristan Agency), operations will be undertaken in line with Government’s directions and in line with national imperatives. Pakistan Army is but one of the implements, which the government can employ to combat terrorism along with other law enforcement agencies.
Instead of mudslinging and casting aspersions at an institution engaged unreservedly in defending the homeland, cognizance must be taken of appreciation of the threat facing Pakistan. As demonstrated by the attack on PAF Base Minhas at Kamra, elements of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), firmly entrenched in NWA have extended the range of their terrorist activities throughout Pakistan. The level of sophistication and expertise acquired by the terrorists is visible proof that they have access to insider information. There are strong indications to suggest that the harbingers of doom and gloom in Pakistan have been infiltrated by hostile agencies to target Pakistan’s strategic interests.  There should not be two opinions on the need that the TTP needs to be neutralized; sooner rather than later; NWA or anywhere their modules are located. The attacks by the Kamikaze style suicide bombers has become ever more lethal because along with the will to sacrifice their lives, the perpetrators of the heinous acts are equipped with state-of-the-art technology, weapons which can wreak havoc and penetrate the best defended targets. Their determination, level of expertise and motivation through training enable them to achieve a modicum of success, which was not available before, when they were content to target buses, cars and street convoys. The attack on GHQ, Pakistan Naval Base Mehran and lately the air base at Kamra depict the new found confidence of the terrorists.
Some elements in the media continue to suggest that the War on Terror is a personal war driven by the dictates of Army’s Leadership. They should realize that it is our survival as a nation; the earlier we can tackle this problem which has acquired gargantuan proportions, the safer we will be.
It must be clear that while launching operations in NWA, the national sovereignty can never be compromised; nor will the policy be dictated by outside interests as suggested by a whispering campaign that the United States is pulling the puppet strings. Of course statements like that, made by US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta that Pakistan has committed itself to invading North Waziristan, do not help matters. He would be better advised to keep his loaded opinions to himself. It would only facilitate the enemies of Pakistan if a wedge were driven between the armed forces of Pakistan and its people. A slandering campaign against the Army Chief by writers like Khaled Ahmad is driven by vested interests and is directed to tarnish Army’s commendable record in combating terrorism. The extent of involvement of the Army is evident from the ratio of the officers and enlisted men, who have embraced shahadat. The number of officers’ sacrifice of their lives is indicative of the fact that the army is leading from the front. Those who find faults with Pakistan’s involvement in the war on terror should provide solutions to resolve the imbroglio we are faced with.

Courtesy: Opinion Maker

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements and or information contained in this article.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam.  Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something els...

What about Israel’s nuclear weapons?

By   Patrick B. Pexton Readers periodically ask me some variation on this question: “Why does the press follow every jot and tittle of Iran’s nuclear program, but we never see any stories about Israel’s nuclear weapons capability?” It’s a fair question. Going back 10 years into Post archives, I could not find any in-depth reporting on Israeli nuclear capabilities, although national security writer  Walter Pincus  has touched on it  many times in his articles and  columns . I spoke with several experts in the nuclear and nonproliferation fields , and they say that the lack of reporting on Israel’s nuclear weapons is real — and frustrating. There are some obvious reasons for this, and others that are not so obvious. First, Israel refuses to acknowledge publicly that it has nuclear weapons. The U.S. government also officially does not acknowledge the existence of such a program. Israel’s official position, as reiterated by Aaron Sagui, spokesman fo...

Pakistani Pilots in Arab Israel War

45 years after the 1967 war: How the Arabs lost Jerusalem War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes gave up their lives for the Arab side during the 1967 Six-Day War. (Image courtesy AP)   By  ALI YOUNES   SPECIAL TO AL ARABIYA This past June marked the 45th anniversary of the Arab defeat of the 1967 war. War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes faithfully gave up their lives for the Arab side, defending the honor of their nations. The actions of those men deserve to be highlighted and explained, especially the contributions of the Pakistani pilot Saiful Azam and the brave Jordanian soldiers of the battle of Ammunition Hill in Jerusalem. At 12:48 p.m. on June 5, four Israeli jets were descending on Jordan’s Mafraq air base to smash the country’s tiny air force, shortly after the entire Egyptian air force had been reduced to rubble.  To intercept the incoming attack, ...