Skip to main content

New kid on PTI's block



By Ahsan Waheed

The thing about politics is that it hardly ever fails to disappoint. War of the words, the mudslinging and back channel deals contain many a surprising twist and turn. But when it comes to Pakistan, many would agree that this suspense increases manifold for the Pakistani political arena, composed of a few mainstream parties but also many smaller parties. After laptop schemes, bickering over tax returns and the defamation of a charity hospital, the most recent addition has been the alleged alliance between Imran Khan’s PTI and Sheikh Rashid Ahmad’s AML. It has raised a furor of questions about the need for this alliance, its benefits and the overall political dynamics of opposition parties.
Although Sheikh Rashid and senior leaders of PTI have denied any formal alliance, it is believed that the two parties concurred to support each other, such that PTI will not nominate a candidate for Rawalpindi NA 55, home constituency to Sheikh Rashid and AML will support PTI in PP-11 ad PP-12 constituencies. Rawalpindi occupies an important place in electoral politics as it includes 7 National Assembly and 14 Punjab Assembly constituencies.
It is quite easy to understand Sheikh Rashid’s incentive for such an alliance. Since 2008, he has lost elections thrice in a row against PML-N. His previous successes were noticed when he was backed by either Sharif or Musharraf. Now with Musharraf no where in sight and Sharifs showing spite for Rashid’s alignment with Musharraf, Awami Muslim League serves to benefit from Khan’s popularity. There are rumors about Rashid rejoining PML-N but the threat of resignation of Hanif Abbasi and Shakil Awan did not permit this. In order to enter mainstream politics, Sheikh Rashid needs to affiliate himself with a strong party. PTI was thus the only recourse left to him.
The more interesting aspect of this alliance is, however, Khan’s motivation. One reason could be an agenda of uniting an anti-establishment opposition for achieving common goals like elimination of corruption. Sheikh Rashid’s contemporary stance against the government is a contradiction to his past political career. Furthermore, much of Khan’s support comes from the youth, a vote bank where Rashid hasn’t done much wonders. Who can forget his role in the Lal Masjid operation?
PTI is seen to be rapidly closing the gap in its race against the PPP and PML-N. Realistically speaking, however, Khan has great ideas but an unclear plan to materialize them. Furthermore, he does not have the same kind of rural support which PPP and PML-N have. So siding with Sheikh Rashid might be a move made to build up support. Although it must be recognized that Sheikh Rashid would only benefit PTI with his candid remarks and inspiring speeches for AML has little resources to offer.
In one of his recent interviews, Khan explained his steadfastness to his objectives. He claimed never to compromise and to use all of his efforts to achieve his goal. If he really wants to eliminate corruption, restore security and facilitate economic growth in Pakistan, is he ready to compromise on his methods by consorting with age old politicians of controversial backgrounds who have failed to deliver before? Sheikh Rashid is the same “Sheeda Talli” whose success Khan prayed would never befall him. Is it then appropriate to call PTI’s tsunami as an agent of change? Since Khan lacks strong political roots to buffer his mistakes, his every move becomes a test. When attending Liaqat Bagh’s procession has warranted Khan’s explanation to his party members, one can only wonder how much this convergence will damage his reputation.
The change that Imran Khan so often calls for cannot come about when he does not have a majority in the parliament. At the end of the day, no matter what method he adopts Khan has to make sure that he can make it into the government. In that case, we might be willing to let him hold off the campaign for change and indulge in traditional politics. Senior PTI member, Jahangir Tareen, places his faith in Khan’s leadership which will prevent any deviations. But does that also render a member’s background insignificant?
A recent Gallup poll showed that PPP’s popularity had diminished while that of PML-N and PTI was increasing. PML-N bet PTI by acquiring a popularity vote of 33% as compared to PTI’s 17%. PTI thus needs to up its game in the next few months. If the overall objective was to garner support against establishment parties then PTI and AML put together are still not a formidable threat to PML-N. Analysts therefore believe that this alliance will not have much of an effect on the overall state of politics. The repercussions of this alliance may not be as serious as being portrayed by the media but it’s a trailer to the upcoming electoral drama heading Pakistan’s political industry.

Courtesy: ZoneAsia-Pk
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements and or information contained in this article.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam.  Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something els...

What about Israel’s nuclear weapons?

By   Patrick B. Pexton Readers periodically ask me some variation on this question: “Why does the press follow every jot and tittle of Iran’s nuclear program, but we never see any stories about Israel’s nuclear weapons capability?” It’s a fair question. Going back 10 years into Post archives, I could not find any in-depth reporting on Israeli nuclear capabilities, although national security writer  Walter Pincus  has touched on it  many times in his articles and  columns . I spoke with several experts in the nuclear and nonproliferation fields , and they say that the lack of reporting on Israel’s nuclear weapons is real — and frustrating. There are some obvious reasons for this, and others that are not so obvious. First, Israel refuses to acknowledge publicly that it has nuclear weapons. The U.S. government also officially does not acknowledge the existence of such a program. Israel’s official position, as reiterated by Aaron Sagui, spokesman fo...

Pakistani Pilots in Arab Israel War

45 years after the 1967 war: How the Arabs lost Jerusalem War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes gave up their lives for the Arab side during the 1967 Six-Day War. (Image courtesy AP)   By  ALI YOUNES   SPECIAL TO AL ARABIYA This past June marked the 45th anniversary of the Arab defeat of the 1967 war. War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes faithfully gave up their lives for the Arab side, defending the honor of their nations. The actions of those men deserve to be highlighted and explained, especially the contributions of the Pakistani pilot Saiful Azam and the brave Jordanian soldiers of the battle of Ammunition Hill in Jerusalem. At 12:48 p.m. on June 5, four Israeli jets were descending on Jordan’s Mafraq air base to smash the country’s tiny air force, shortly after the entire Egyptian air force had been reduced to rubble.  To intercept the incoming attack, ...