Skip to main content

Chronological events and Asif Ali Zardari



by Dr Ghayur Ayub
There are some strange linkages in certain chronological events that faced Pakistan in the first decade of 21st century. The trends continue. Some would label them part of 'conspiracy theories, other would call them, ‘coincidences’ or ‘prudent planning’.
The term 'conspiracy theory' was first used in 1871 in an article in the Journal of Mental Science with reference to the Fifth Quarterly Meeting of the Medico-Psychological Association, now known as the Royal College of Psychiatrists. With changing human psyche according to societal development the meaning changed accordingly. It is generally presumed that the conspiracy theorists believe that complex plots are put into motion by powerful hidden forces to steal power, money or freedom from the people. Since the mid-1960s the term has acquired a somewhat derogatory meaning, implying a paranoid tendency to see the influence of some malign covert agency in events. When such theories turn factual, as 'Watergate break in', they are relabeled as investigative journalism or historical analysis.
Coincidences’, on the other hand, are described as, “a collection of two or more events or conditions, closely related by time, space, form, or other associations which appear unlikely to bear a relationship as either cause to effect or effects of a shared cause, within the observer's or observers' understanding of what cause can produce what effects”. In science, the term means when two rays of light strike a surface at the same point at the same time with no implication that the alignment of events is surprising or noteworthy. For intuitive people coincidences are full of noteworthy meanings unexplained through logic in the beginning but proved correct later when the conclusive results appear logical in hind-side discussions.
‘Prudent planning’ is part of human calculation about future strategies based on elaborate assessments. Quran speaks of such planning in the Sura 3:54.
Which brand, if any, can be linked to the following chronological events is a matter I would leave to the thinking mind of the reader;
  • Early 2001; General Musharaf was considered as a thorn in the back of democracy. America demeaned him in every possible way. A year earlier the US President reluctantly met him on his flying visit to Pakistan.
  • 9/11/2001; Twin Towers and Pentagon were attacked. Within a week Gen Musharaf got the famous 'phone call', which changed his fortune. He became the darling of the Americans and personal friend of President Bush.
  • 2002; Benazir Bhutto, after desperate attempts, managed to make contacts with the third tier American political elites.
  • August, 2002; Asif Ali Zardari was transferred to the plush top floor of Pakistan Institute Medical Science especially prepared for the VVIPs. At one stage Mr Shahbaz Sharif was admitted to it when he was the Chief Minister of Punjab in 1997/98.
  • 2002-2004; Musharaf had full control over the events wearing four caps. His relations with Saudi King improved.
  • 2004/2005; BB managed to upgrade her contacts in America with influential second tier elites. AAZ was released in 2004 and went to Dubai but returned in 2005 and failed to start a new political career in Lahore.
  • 2004/2005; Americans started to demand ‘do more’ from Musharaf.
  • 2005; BB made contacts with Nawaz Sharif in Jeddha.
  • 2005; Swiss Cases against BB and AAZ were reaching to a conclusive end. Fearing arrest, AAZ flew to America suffering from back and cervical ailments which changed later to mental disability.
  • 2005/2006; contacts between BB and NS increased which led to signing of CoD in May 2006.
  • 2006; BB convinced the second tier US personalities that Pakistan needed 'true democracy' that was friendly with Afghanistan, India and the West.
  • 2006; British/Americans arranged secret contacts between BB and Musharaf.
  • 2006; Americans started to demean Musharaf through; 1) increasing rhetoric of 'do more', 2) Karzai of Afghanistan, 3) the emerging democratic forces in Pakistan.
  • Autumn 2006; a private one-on-one four hour meeting was held between AAZ and a common friend at his flat in New York. In the meeting AAZ predicted that he was going to play pivotal role in global politics that included averting the clash of civilisations.
  • Spring 2007; CJP was sacked leading to street demonstrations making Musharaf vulnerable to agree on NRO that became a certificate for 1) BB to go back to Pakistan, 2) AAZ to go to Dubai. .
  • September 2007; BB landed in Karachi for an unprecedented welcome where a few months earlier Ch Iftekhar was not allowed to leave the airport. She was warned through Karsaz bombing to stick to the agreement. But soon she started to violate it to the distaste of the Americans.
  • Nov 3rd 2007; second emergency-plus was declared and BB returned to Pakistan breaking a private visit to Dubai among confusions.
  • December, 27th 2007; BB was assassinated in the midst of pre and post assassination controversies,
  • End of 2007; AAZ came to Pakistan with a handwritten 'Will' making him the party leader. As a leader he transferred the leadership to his son NOT before changing his name to 'Bhutto'. He nominated himself the 'Co-chair person' of PPP for a specific period.
  • 2008; AAZ took over the party with a 'new team', participated in elections and installed hand-picked PM, Speaker of the Parliament and Chairman Senate, aiming at the Presidency occupied by Musharaf, who by then, was repudiated by the Americans. He parleyed with Nawaz Sharif on principles of CoD convincing him to restore the Judiciary within one month.
  • Americans found AAZ more amenable than BB to take the mutual understandings forward. Musharaf for them was a fallen pawn, NS a potential obstacle and Q-League not a 'Qatil-League'.
  • PML-N left the coalition government in the centre within 6 weeks but AAZ let PPP continue in Punjab.
  • August 2008; AAZ became the President and continued till the end of the first decade of the 21st century. The rest is history.
For some, AAZ's prediction in the autumn of 2006 might be the most important event which if taken in context of 'prudent planning' could have serious consequences in view of Hussain Haqqani interactions with Mansoor Ijaz in Memmogate scandal. But then we have to keep in mind what Sura 3:54 says, “And Allah is the Best of the planners.” We saw it's reflection recently in Malik Riaz case.

Source: [http://www.opinion-maker.org/2012/07/chronological-events-and-aaz/]

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements and or information contained in this article.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam.  Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something els...

What about Israel’s nuclear weapons?

By   Patrick B. Pexton Readers periodically ask me some variation on this question: “Why does the press follow every jot and tittle of Iran’s nuclear program, but we never see any stories about Israel’s nuclear weapons capability?” It’s a fair question. Going back 10 years into Post archives, I could not find any in-depth reporting on Israeli nuclear capabilities, although national security writer  Walter Pincus  has touched on it  many times in his articles and  columns . I spoke with several experts in the nuclear and nonproliferation fields , and they say that the lack of reporting on Israel’s nuclear weapons is real — and frustrating. There are some obvious reasons for this, and others that are not so obvious. First, Israel refuses to acknowledge publicly that it has nuclear weapons. The U.S. government also officially does not acknowledge the existence of such a program. Israel’s official position, as reiterated by Aaron Sagui, spokesman fo...

Pakistani Pilots in Arab Israel War

45 years after the 1967 war: How the Arabs lost Jerusalem War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes gave up their lives for the Arab side during the 1967 Six-Day War. (Image courtesy AP)   By  ALI YOUNES   SPECIAL TO AL ARABIYA This past June marked the 45th anniversary of the Arab defeat of the 1967 war. War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes faithfully gave up their lives for the Arab side, defending the honor of their nations. The actions of those men deserve to be highlighted and explained, especially the contributions of the Pakistani pilot Saiful Azam and the brave Jordanian soldiers of the battle of Ammunition Hill in Jerusalem. At 12:48 p.m. on June 5, four Israeli jets were descending on Jordan’s Mafraq air base to smash the country’s tiny air force, shortly after the entire Egyptian air force had been reduced to rubble.  To intercept the incoming attack, ...