Skip to main content

Peace overtures to India

By

At Istanbul, India tried to scuttle Pakistan’s proposal for peace in Afghanistan by making counterproductive suggestions. Earlier, Hamid Karzai also attempted back stabbing by signing an agreement with India for training Afghan forces. However, either it is naïveté or sheer skullduggery that Pakistan is agreeing to all Indian proposals without demanding anything in return like resolving the long outstanding Kashmir issue.

By S. M. Hali
Pakistan is bending backwards to appease India and make friends with it. We are mercurial in our behavior as a nation; either we hate fervently or love ardently; there is no middle of the road for us. Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani, during the concluding session of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting, supported and seconded India's proposal for a four year extension in the term of Kamlesh Sharma as Secretary General of the Commonwealth. Gilani rationalized that the move was in reciprocation for India's backing of Pakistan in recent elections for a non-permanent slot in the UN Security Council. Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani forgets that India’s vote for Pakistan came in the backdrop of Pakistan backing India in the same forum last year. If that were not enough, Pakistan returned an Indian Army helicopter along with its crew within four hours of violating Pakistan’s airspace last month despite India having shot down PN’s Atlantique aircraft within Pakistani territory in 1999.
Pakistan has taken a giant leap of faith by granting Most Favored Nation (MFN) status to India. Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani confirmed the decision after a meeting with Dr. Manmohan Singh during the SAARC Summit at Maldives. India has been aspiring to achieve this status, whose pros nor cons have been thought through by Pakistan nor proper infrastructure with private sector participation been placed at Wagah border or a Container yard established, nor loading and unloading space expanded, or a full-fledged online banking facility, quarantine department and other labs set up. Trade balance is already in India’s favour due to non-tariff barriers. India granted the MFN status to Pakistan, to comply with the principles of World Trade Organization (WTO) regime in 1995, and Pakistan’s reluctance in reciprocating so far was consequential owing to trade imbalance reservations. India had been insisting that increased trade relationship can play a vital role in normalizing the political relationship between the two countries, brushing the Kashmir issue under the carpet. It is distressing that reportedly at the behest of India, Bangladesh appealed the WTO not to grant Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) to Pakistan, as it would affect its textile export to the European Union and other European countries. Bangladesh made a petition to the WTO on the issue, expressing the fear that country like Bangladesh would be badly affected if the proposed GSP facility was granted in favour of Pakistan. This move is akin to stabbing Pakistan in the back but Pakistani leadership is oblivious to conspiracies being hatched against it and is bent upon following the US diktat to improve ties with India. There are rumors in the Indian social media that palms were greased to ensure that India is granted MFN status.
During the recent regional countries conference at Istanbul, India tried to scuttle Pakistan’s proposal for peace in Afghanistan by making counterproductive suggestions. Earlier, Hamid Karzai also attempted back stabbing by signing an agreement with India for training Afghan forces. However, either it is naïveté or sheer skullduggery that Pakistan is agreeing to all Indian proposals without demanding anything in return like resolving the long outstanding Kashmir issue. It may be recalled that since its inception in 1947 Pakistan has taken several such magnanimous decisions. It accepted a ceasefire in Kashmir in 1948 because India promised to abide by UN Resolution to hold a plebiscite in Kashmir, which in the past six and a half decades, Indian armed forces have trampled under their boots. In 1958, Pakistan, took another magnanimous decision to solve the issue of India stealing Pakistan’s river waters and signed the Indus Waters Treaty with India under the umbrella of the World Bank and USA. This treaty was signed in 1960 through which Pakistan lost waters of the Sutlej, Beas and Ravi, to India, though these rivers were already allotted to Pakistan in the Radcliff Award in 1947. With the signing of the Indus Waters Treaty, Pakistan hoped that the regional water issue of the Indus River system would be solved forever. However, this did not happen. Since then several violations of the treaty have been committed by India, including Sallal hydroelectric project, Wullar barrage project, Baglihar hydroelectric project, Kishanganga hydroelectric project and release of floodwaters in the Ravi and the Sutlej. The issues of Siachen and Sir Creek are also pending settlement but we have chosen to adopt a course of self destruction by courting India one-sidedly. A financially stressed country like Pakistan needs to look before it leaps rather than make peace overtures to India.

Courtesy: Opinion Maker.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements and or information contained in this article.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By
By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam.  Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something els...
2 comments
Read more

What about Israel’s nuclear weapons?

By
By   Patrick B. Pexton Readers periodically ask me some variation on this question: “Why does the press follow every jot and tittle of Iran’s nuclear program, but we never see any stories about Israel’s nuclear weapons capability?” It’s a fair question. Going back 10 years into Post archives, I could not find any in-depth reporting on Israeli nuclear capabilities, although national security writer  Walter Pincus  has touched on it  many times in his articles and  columns . I spoke with several experts in the nuclear and nonproliferation fields , and they say that the lack of reporting on Israel’s nuclear weapons is real — and frustrating. There are some obvious reasons for this, and others that are not so obvious. First, Israel refuses to acknowledge publicly that it has nuclear weapons. The U.S. government also officially does not acknowledge the existence of such a program. Israel’s official position, as reiterated by Aaron Sagui, spokesman fo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Muslim Pages on Facebook | What Happened To You ???

By
I was prompted to highlight this issue because people were going crazy on the social media specially facebook over the blasphemous anti-Islamic film.  Yes, the film is blasphemous and the makers of the film should be punished because there is a clear difference between freedom of speech and hate speech. But the thing that I am going to highlight is the pictures that are being spread all over the facebook, for example have a look at this one: Translates : Hitler writes in his book My Struggle that "If I had wanted I could have killed all the jews of the world but I left a few for the world to know why I killed them" Now, the book My Struggle was published in 1924 and the Holocaust happened in 1930, how could Adolf Hitler wrote about Holocaust six years prior to its happening ? Take a look at this picture:  Does the maker of this photo even know that it was Hitler's holocaust that led the zionists accelerate their activities in getting a homeland ? N...
3 comments
Read more