Skip to main content

Pakistan starts boosting trade with India

Pakistan agreed to normalize trading relations with India, a move that may give a boost to moribund talks aimed at improving relations between the hostile South Asian neighbors. Pakistan’s Information...


Pakistan agreed to normalize trading relations with India, a move that may give a boost to moribund talks aimed at improving relations between the hostile South Asian neighbors.
Pakistan’s Information Minister Firdous Ashiq Awan told a news conference Wednesday that Pakistan’s cabinet decided to grant India “Most Favored Nation” status, a decision that will likely boost bilateral trade.
“This was a decision taken in the national interest and all stakeholders, including our military and defense institutions, were on board,” Ms. Awan said.
Under World Trade Organization agreements, the MFN principle is supposed to ensure that WTO members don’t discriminate against one another, allowing all countries in the organization to benefit equally from the lowest possible tariffs.
India granted Pakistan MFN status in the mid-1990s, but Pakistan declined to reciprocate despite its WTO obligations. Both countries are members of the WTO.
Instead, Pakistan has limited imports from India to fewer than 2,000 items. Under the new arrangement, Pakistan will move to a “negative list” of goods—items of strategic importance such as defense equipment—which it will continue to ban, while allowing trade in a wider range of products.
The move is a rare goodwill gesture by Pakistan to India, with which it has fought three wars since 1947, and may help kick-start peace talks that have made little headway in recent years. The two countries have been trying to improve relations through the talks, launched in 2004 but suspended after Pakistani militants attacked Mumbai in 2008, killing more than 160 people.
The discussions started again in earnest in February after India agreed to Pakistan’s demands to broaden discussions to focus on issues such as trade and the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir. India earlier had said it was unwilling to discuss these issues until Pakistan cracked down on militants that threaten India.
Both sides have been focusing on regular meetings of trade bureaucrats as a way to edge the talks forward, rather than hoping for a major breakthrough on more intractable problems like Kashmir, which is divided between India and Pakistan and claimed by both in its entirety.
The trade detente comes as tensions have risen recently over India’s efforts to increase its participation in Afghanistan’s economy, including spending more than $1 billion in aid to improve infrastructure and a recent agreement to train Afghan security forces.
Pakistan considers Afghanistan its backyard and is hoping to play a major role in tentative peace talks between the U.S. and Taliban fighters. It is opposed to India’s rising influence in Afghanistan.
India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has said India won’t achieve its economic potential until it forges peace with Pakistan and opens trade routes toward Afghanistan and Central Asian nations.
Chandrajit Banerjee, director general of the Confederation of Indian Industry, a trade group, said in a statement that Pakistan’s decision to grant MFN status to India will help give a big jump to bilateral trade and pave the way for economic integration of South Asia.
Bilateral trade could jump to $8 billion in five years, he said. But both sides still need to address issues such as the difficulty of obtaining business visas, nontariff barriers to trade and the need to liberalize investment, Mr. Banerjee added.
Some Pakistani politicians had argued that MFN status for India should be linked to the resolution of the Kashmir issue, and the decision to move ahead anyway was a rare bright spot in relations.
Still, Pakistan’s failure to push ahead with the trials of seven Pakistani militants that it has charged in connection with the Mumbai attacks remains a major stumbling block to the overall normalization of relations between the two nations.
It is unclear whether Wednesday’s move will immediately propel trade higher, largely because nontariff barriers to trade, such as onerous labeling requirements, could still make things difficult for exporters. A highly militarized border between the two nations—with only one major overland trade post—is also likely to continue to limit commerce despite moves to expand the capacity of customs facilities at that post.
There is huge room for growth in trade. In the year ended March 31, India exported $2.33 billion of goods to Pakistan. In the same period, Pakistan sold goods valued at $332.5 million in India, according to Indian government statistics.
By comparison, two-way trade between India and China, New Delhi’s largest trading partner, is valued at more than $60 billion annually.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements and or information contained in this article. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam.  Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something els...

What about Israel’s nuclear weapons?

By   Patrick B. Pexton Readers periodically ask me some variation on this question: “Why does the press follow every jot and tittle of Iran’s nuclear program, but we never see any stories about Israel’s nuclear weapons capability?” It’s a fair question. Going back 10 years into Post archives, I could not find any in-depth reporting on Israeli nuclear capabilities, although national security writer  Walter Pincus  has touched on it  many times in his articles and  columns . I spoke with several experts in the nuclear and nonproliferation fields , and they say that the lack of reporting on Israel’s nuclear weapons is real — and frustrating. There are some obvious reasons for this, and others that are not so obvious. First, Israel refuses to acknowledge publicly that it has nuclear weapons. The U.S. government also officially does not acknowledge the existence of such a program. Israel’s official position, as reiterated by Aaron Sagui, spokesman fo...

Muslim Pages on Facebook | What Happened To You ???

I was prompted to highlight this issue because people were going crazy on the social media specially facebook over the blasphemous anti-Islamic film.  Yes, the film is blasphemous and the makers of the film should be punished because there is a clear difference between freedom of speech and hate speech. But the thing that I am going to highlight is the pictures that are being spread all over the facebook, for example have a look at this one: Translates : Hitler writes in his book My Struggle that "If I had wanted I could have killed all the jews of the world but I left a few for the world to know why I killed them" Now, the book My Struggle was published in 1924 and the Holocaust happened in 1930, how could Adolf Hitler wrote about Holocaust six years prior to its happening ? Take a look at this picture:  Does the maker of this photo even know that it was Hitler's holocaust that led the zionists accelerate their activities in getting a homeland ? N...