Skip to main content

Condoleezza Rice Talks Values


An Analysis  
By Lawrence Davidson
Condoleezza Rice was both National Security Advisor and Secretary of State under President George W. Bush. She was also an administration spokesperson who helped scare the American people into supporting the invasion of Iraq. She accomplished this by invoking the image of "mushroom clouds" incinerating the skylines of America. In doing so she gave credence to the false story that Iraq was a threat to the United States because it possessedweapons of mass destruction (WMDs).
 Rice is presently on a lecture tour promoting her 734 page memoir entitled No Higher Honor(Crown, 1 November 2011). That is what brought her to the Belk Theater on the campus ofQueens University in Charlotte, North Carolina on 25 October 2011. There she spoke to a packed house of 2000 people. Actually, what made this event notable was not the large numbers who had come to hear her, but rather that, among other things, Condoleezza Rice chose to speak about values.
 According to Ms Rice our present challenge "is not China or Brazil or India, and certainly not Europe. The challenge is the United States gone bad." Well, she should know. Despite the factthat values are fluid concepts most people esteem the precepts underlying honest government and respect for the law. Most but not all, and it may very well be that Rice is not with the majority on this. There is no living group of individuals who have done more to undermine these sort of crucial values than those who worked in the Bush Jr. White House. Truth in government, due process in the Justice System, personal protection from official spying, regulating economic greed and corruption, and a general respect for the Constitution and its Bill of Rights, you name it and they managed to trash it. And, of course, Condoleezza Rice was there throughout the entire eight your assault on those sort of values.
 Not surprisingly, in her Charlotte address Rice avoided these topics and instead focused on the value found in equal opportunity. "The idea that you can come from humble circumstances and also do great things" seems to her beyond the reach of today’s American youth. That is one of the ways America has "gone bad." Ms Rice seemed to be suggesting that she is one of the last to be able to make this leap, coming as she did "from segregated Birmingham to the highest reaches of government."
 It has always been one of America’s foundational myths that any child can "grow up to be president," or the CEO of some giant corporation, or just become fabulously wealthy. Of course some do. Some people hit the lottery as well, but the numbers are exceedingly small. This reflects the very low probability that any one individual, not born with the proverbial silver spoon in their mouth, can succeed to this extent. The hard fact is that any suggestion on the part of Ms Rice that there has ever been a time when such a jump from rags to riches was possible for most Americans is as misleading as the stories she spun to help get us into the Iraq war.
 Yet it is clear that this myth never seems to die. For instance, it is this misconception that leads ordinary Americans to often oppose fair taxation of the rich. After all, someday they or their children might be rich and they won’t want to be taxed either. This is the "lotto nation" syndromesometimes referred to by Keith Obermann. Not only is Rice a true believer in this myth, but she seems not to understand that it was her boss, George W. Bush, who pushed economic policies that made her special value of equal opportunity ever harder to achieve. One wonders if she was really paying attention during those eight years in the "highest reaches of government."
 Not wanting to be entirely negative–after all the "U.S. gone bad" is pretty tough–Ms Rice sought to end her talk on a high note. Despite all, she told her 2000 strong audience, "I believe we will again make the impossible dream inevitable." What an unfortunate contradiction in terms from a lady whose day job is teaching at Stanford University.
 But it is not Ms Rice’s words that are at issue here. It is her sense of values. Condoleezza Rice might have improbably risen out of segregated Birmingham, but for what? What sort of values did she display? What great things did she accomplish? Well, she assisted in the killing of between 600,00 and 1 million Iraqis and over 33,000 Americans and did so on the basis of false claims. This is the sort of record that ought to put one before the International Criminal Court and not in the halls of a great university.
 Compared to others of our age who have risen from obscurity, people such as Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, Caesar Chavez, etc. Rice’s sense of values is just appalling. The fact that she rose to the "highest reaches of government" suggests a Faustian bargain that led to eight full years of the corruption of values. Her memoirs, No Higher Honor, is therefore grotesquely miss-titled. Indeed, it is hard to imagine a more dishonorable record.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements and or information contained in this article. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam.  Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something els...

What about Israel’s nuclear weapons?

By   Patrick B. Pexton Readers periodically ask me some variation on this question: “Why does the press follow every jot and tittle of Iran’s nuclear program, but we never see any stories about Israel’s nuclear weapons capability?” It’s a fair question. Going back 10 years into Post archives, I could not find any in-depth reporting on Israeli nuclear capabilities, although national security writer  Walter Pincus  has touched on it  many times in his articles and  columns . I spoke with several experts in the nuclear and nonproliferation fields , and they say that the lack of reporting on Israel’s nuclear weapons is real — and frustrating. There are some obvious reasons for this, and others that are not so obvious. First, Israel refuses to acknowledge publicly that it has nuclear weapons. The U.S. government also officially does not acknowledge the existence of such a program. Israel’s official position, as reiterated by Aaron Sagui, spokesman fo...

Pakistani Pilots in Arab Israel War

45 years after the 1967 war: How the Arabs lost Jerusalem War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes gave up their lives for the Arab side during the 1967 Six-Day War. (Image courtesy AP)   By  ALI YOUNES   SPECIAL TO AL ARABIYA This past June marked the 45th anniversary of the Arab defeat of the 1967 war. War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes faithfully gave up their lives for the Arab side, defending the honor of their nations. The actions of those men deserve to be highlighted and explained, especially the contributions of the Pakistani pilot Saiful Azam and the brave Jordanian soldiers of the battle of Ammunition Hill in Jerusalem. At 12:48 p.m. on June 5, four Israeli jets were descending on Jordan’s Mafraq air base to smash the country’s tiny air force, shortly after the entire Egyptian air force had been reduced to rubble.  To intercept the incoming attack, ...