Skip to main content

Pitting one against the other




News of warring institutions in a country hinged on teetering arthritic structures flooded media channels for the larger part of the current year. The Supreme Court became the amphitheater where every institution was called in and thrown to the lions (read media) while the people cheered on for whichever institution appeared to be winning. National interest became the die everyone squabbled over to call dibs on. A day in the limelight became reason enough to take on entire institutions and what was once sacrosanct became a source of entertainment for the masses. Welcome to state politics- where the intrigue never ends. 
Recently a retired military lawyer Inam Ur Raheem stirred the hornet’s nest by initiating a legal challenge seeking to end the tenure of COAS General Kayani by labeling the terms of his extension as illegal. The court did not entertain his appeal, calling it non-maintainable. While the case should’ve been laid to rest for good, the airwaves were soon abuzz with reports that Inam had allegedly been attacked by MI officials in broad daylight. An FIR was subsequently filed in RA Bazaar Police Station Rawalpindi, against COAS Kayani and MI DG Maj- Gen Naushad Kayani.

Inam ur Rahim’s fortuitous timing in appealing two years after the COAS’s extension, right after the Asghar Khan case’s verdict, is no accident. The case was timed to create maximum impact and draw the most amount of blood, however once the case was withdrawn, the prosecutor went ahead and alleged that Military Intelligence had him beaten up in broad daylight in front of a public audience. Instead of putting two and two together and calling these miscreants out for what they are, the media sidled up to the lawyer (who had earlier been involved in defending a military officer later indicted for spreading Islamist propaganda) and created a furor over the incident which could even havehappened as a result of a personal enmity.
The question of who sent thugs to beat up the retired lawyer remains to be investigated, however, what is unfortunate is how local and foreign media, with Mr Declan Walsh at the fore, have set camp on Mr Inam’s bandwagon. COAS Kayani’s statement earlier this week attempted to shift the planes of argument above trivialities and discuss national interest and consensus instead of cleaving the masses from institutions one by one.  Current goings-on however, tell a sinister tale.
Inam states that he would not be deterred if the police do not take on this case as there is no stopping now. The absence of evidence and sufficient investigation does not seem to dissuade anyone from pointing fingers at the military establishment and leaders, and instead are providing fuel to fire. It is unfortunate how the current prevalent discourse aims to accomplish a singular target, that is, deepen the military civilian divide and tarnish the Army’s reputation.
How the honorable Supreme Court chooses to respond to Inam’s latest accusations against the military now remains to be seen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam.  Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something else an

Waging war on ourselves

BY  ETHAN CASEY A couple of years ago, giving a talk at a church in Seattle, I was conveying as best I could the anger Pakistanis feel toward the US about drone attacks, when a woman raised her hand and asked, “What’s a drone attack?” I give her credit for asking, but I was astounded nonetheless. Ever since then I’ve kept that woman in my mind, and often cited her to audiences, as an example of the ignorance of ordinary Americans about things that are happening – I should say things we’re doing to other people – beyond our shores. My mentor  Clyde Edwin Pettit  used to say that we’re all ignorant, only about different things. That can be a helpful working assumption when trying to achieve common understanding, but it’s also true that some of us are closer than others to the coal face of hard experience. For example, the novelist  John Grisham recently pointed out  that support for the death penalty is “still very much the consensus among white people in the South. Black people kno

Muslim Pages on Facebook | What Happened To You ???

I was prompted to highlight this issue because people were going crazy on the social media specially facebook over the blasphemous anti-Islamic film.  Yes, the film is blasphemous and the makers of the film should be punished because there is a clear difference between freedom of speech and hate speech. But the thing that I am going to highlight is the pictures that are being spread all over the facebook, for example have a look at this one: Translates : Hitler writes in his book My Struggle that "If I had wanted I could have killed all the jews of the world but I left a few for the world to know why I killed them" Now, the book My Struggle was published in 1924 and the Holocaust happened in 1930, how could Adolf Hitler wrote about Holocaust six years prior to its happening ? Take a look at this picture:  Does the maker of this photo even know that it was Hitler's holocaust that led the zionists accelerate their activities in getting a homeland ? N