Skip to main content

Pitting one against the other

By



News of warring institutions in a country hinged on teetering arthritic structures flooded media channels for the larger part of the current year. The Supreme Court became the amphitheater where every institution was called in and thrown to the lions (read media) while the people cheered on for whichever institution appeared to be winning. National interest became the die everyone squabbled over to call dibs on. A day in the limelight became reason enough to take on entire institutions and what was once sacrosanct became a source of entertainment for the masses. Welcome to state politics- where the intrigue never ends. 
Recently a retired military lawyer Inam Ur Raheem stirred the hornet’s nest by initiating a legal challenge seeking to end the tenure of COAS General Kayani by labeling the terms of his extension as illegal. The court did not entertain his appeal, calling it non-maintainable. While the case should’ve been laid to rest for good, the airwaves were soon abuzz with reports that Inam had allegedly been attacked by MI officials in broad daylight. An FIR was subsequently filed in RA Bazaar Police Station Rawalpindi, against COAS Kayani and MI DG Maj- Gen Naushad Kayani.
Inam ur Rahim’s fortuitous timing in appealing two years after the COAS’s extension, right after the Asghar Khan case’s verdict, is no accident. The case was timed to create maximum impact and draw the most amount of blood, however once the case was withdrawn, the prosecutor went ahead and alleged that Military Intelligence had him beaten up in broad daylight in front of a public audience. Instead of putting two and two together and calling these miscreants out for what they are, the media sidled up to the lawyer (who had earlier been involved in defending a military officer later indicted for spreading Islamist propaganda) and created a furor over the incident which could even havehappened as a result of a personal enmity.
The question of who sent thugs to beat up the retired lawyer remains to be investigated, however, what is unfortunate is how local and foreign media, with Mr Declan Walsh at the fore, have set camp on Mr Inam’s bandwagon. COAS Kayani’s statement earlier this week attempted to shift the planes of argument above trivialities and discuss national interest and consensus instead of cleaving the masses from institutions one by one.  Current goings-on however, tell a sinister tale.
Inam states that he would not be deterred if the police do not take on this case as there is no stopping now. The absence of evidence and sufficient investigation does not seem to dissuade anyone from pointing fingers at the military establishment and leaders, and instead are providing fuel to fire. It is unfortunate how the current prevalent discourse aims to accomplish a singular target, that is, deepen the military civilian divide and tarnish the Army’s reputation.
How the honorable Supreme Court chooses to respond to Inam’s latest accusations against the military now remains to be seen.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By
By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam.  Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something els...
2 comments
Read more

Waging war on ourselves

By
BY  ETHAN CASEY A couple of years ago, giving a talk at a church in Seattle, I was conveying as best I could the anger Pakistanis feel toward the US about drone attacks, when a woman raised her hand and asked, “What’s a drone attack?” I give her credit for asking, but I was astounded nonetheless. Ever since then I’ve kept that woman in my mind, and often cited her to audiences, as an example of the ignorance of ordinary Americans about things that are happening – I should say things we’re doing to other people – beyond our shores. My mentor  Clyde Edwin Pettit  used to say that we’re all ignorant, only about different things. That can be a helpful working assumption when trying to achieve common understanding, but it’s also true that some of us are closer than others to the coal face of hard experience. For example, the novelist  John Grisham recently pointed out  that support for the death penalty is “still very much the consensus among white people i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pakistani Pilots in Arab Israel War

By
45 years after the 1967 war: How the Arabs lost Jerusalem War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes gave up their lives for the Arab side during the 1967 Six-Day War. (Image courtesy AP)   By  ALI YOUNES   SPECIAL TO AL ARABIYA This past June marked the 45th anniversary of the Arab defeat of the 1967 war. War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes faithfully gave up their lives for the Arab side, defending the honor of their nations. The actions of those men deserve to be highlighted and explained, especially the contributions of the Pakistani pilot Saiful Azam and the brave Jordanian soldiers of the battle of Ammunition Hill in Jerusalem. At 12:48 p.m. on June 5, four Israeli jets were descending on Jordan’s Mafraq air base to smash the country’s tiny air force, shortly after the entire Egyptian air force had been reduced to rubble.  To intercept the incoming attack, ...
2 comments
Read more