The US consulate in Benghazi, Libya NEVER existed.

A US consulate in Benghazi, Libya where the US

ambassador was allegedly killed, NEVER existed.

It was an office which was never set up for any

purposes. The only vacancy advertised was for a driver

on the 23rd of August, 2012, one day prior to the

official opening of US embassy in Tripoli, Libya. Apart

from this one vacancy there is no other proof of any

consulate offices being present in any city of Libya apart

from the main US embassy in Tripoli, the capital.

There is no proof of existence of a US consulate in

Benghazi according to the US state department's

webiste.

www.usembassy.gov

Keeping in mind that Chris Stevens was not an ordinary

official at the embassy in Tripoli but the ambassador

himself.

libya.usembassy.gov/index.html

There are a few questions that need to be answered and no one currently has asked these questions nor has

anyone mentioned them.

1. The US consulate in Ben Ghazi is not listed on US state department's website. Why?

2. The website of US embassy in Tripoli, Libya tells us that Chris Stevens was the US ambassador to Libya.

What was he doing in Ben Ghazi with no security?

3. If, Chris Stevens, was visiting the US consulate (if there was ever one) where was the consular at the time

of Steven's death?

4. If, Chris Stevens, was outside Tripoli on an official visit, why was there no adequate security provided at

the consulate (if there ever was one)?

5. The Libyan government has said it was foreigners behind the coordinated attack and that they have

information which they are sharing with the US officials. They also say that the *foreigners* are in custody.

Is this another pretext to war?

6. The US constitution allows a current serving president to cancel elections if there is a situation which

demands the cancellation of elections i.e. threat to national security and interests. Is there any chance of

Obama using this law? Although it never has been before.

We advise every one to ask these question and then try and find the answers yourself. Do not forget if you

ask these questions to officials you might be classed as a conspiracy theorist as is the norm today.

Ask Questions!!! Wake up!! Don't be a Sheep!!!

Comments

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam. Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something els...

Waging war on ourselves

BY ETHAN CASEY A couple of years ago, giving a talk at a church in Seattle, I was conveying as best I could the anger Pakistanis feel toward the US about drone attacks, when a woman raised her hand and asked, “What’s a drone attack?” I give her credit for asking, but I was astounded nonetheless. Ever since then I’ve kept that woman in my mind, and often cited her to audiences, as an example of the ignorance of ordinary Americans about things that are happening – I should say things we’re doing to other people – beyond our shores. My mentor Clyde Edwin Pettit used to say that we’re all ignorant, only about different things. That can be a helpful working assumption when trying to achieve common understanding, but it’s also true that some of us are closer than others to the coal face of hard experience. For example, the novelist John Grisham recently pointed out that support for the death penalty is “still very much the consensus among white people i...

Pakistani Pilots in Arab Israel War

45 years after the 1967 war: How the Arabs lost Jerusalem War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes gave up their lives for the Arab side during the 1967 Six-Day War. (Image courtesy AP) By ALI YOUNES SPECIAL TO AL ARABIYA This past June marked the 45th anniversary of the Arab defeat of the 1967 war. War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes faithfully gave up their lives for the Arab side, defending the honor of their nations. The actions of those men deserve to be highlighted and explained, especially the contributions of the Pakistani pilot Saiful Azam and the brave Jordanian soldiers of the battle of Ammunition Hill in Jerusalem. At 12:48 p.m. on June 5, four Israeli jets were descending on Jordan’s Mafraq air base to smash the country’s tiny air force, shortly after the entire Egyptian air force had been reduced to rubble. To intercept the incoming attack, ...

SPY EYES ANALYSIS

Search This Blog