Skip to main content

Generals in the dock

By

S. M. Hali
The annals of Pakistan’s history indicate that till recently, the Army was treated as a holy cow. Even if its personnel were involved in corruption, their trial or other administrative action taken against them would be hushed up and the general public or media would not even get a whiff of the case. Some senior officers of the Pakistan Navy and Air Force on the other hand, have been tried and the cases have been public knowledge however, this is the first time that the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has made public the names of three senior army officers, Major General Khalid Zaheer Akhtar, Lieutenant Generals Khalid Munir and Afzal Muzzafar to be involved in what is now being termed as the National Logistic Cell (NLC) scam. It goes to the army’s credit that instead of hushing the scandal up, it ordered investigations and recording of Summary of Evidence (SoE), which is the preliminary step in  requisitioning a Court Martial. The Army Chief, under his discretionary powers, could have taken administrative action against them but to make the process transparent and providing a fair chance to both the prosecutor and the defendant, he ordered them to be tried under military law. For the recording of the SoE, it was essential to bring the accused officers under Pakistan Army Act (PAA); hence since the accused officers had already retired, they had to be taken back on the strength of the army. This was done in accordance with PAA Section 92, read in conjunction with Section 40. ISPR has released details of its investigation, taking pains to clarify that the accused officers have neither been re-hired nor reinstated, nor would they be receiving any pay, allowances and other privileges for the period.
In face of mounting criticism against the army for not permitting the NAB (National Accountability Bureau) to interrogate the three retired Generals accused of causing billions in losses to the national exchequer, the ISPR rejoinder is attempted at justifying Army’s actions. The ISPR emphasizes that National Logistics Board implemented important reforms after the case came to light in 2009, stating that the NLC returned approximately Rs 9.3 billion in loans in 2011 and posted a net profit of Rs 3 billion. That does not atone for the financial scandal, which resulted in a loss of Rs1.84 billion to the national kitty, where the accused illegally borrowed Rs 4.3 billion from banks and invested the money in the stock market by purchasing shares of different enlisted companies/institutions, violating the NLC's board of directors (BoD) instructions. 
The GHQ is evaluating the evidence and experts are being consulted in the investigation of the record of the case. Basing on the credibility of the evidence accrued through the SoE, the COAS will decide on the next legal step. Some critics point out that since the former Generals had committed a civilian offence; they should have been investigated by the NAB and tried by a civilian court. They construe that the move to re-subject them to the PAA and try them through a military court, may be an attempt at protecting them from harsher punishment. The fact is that the trio has already brought Pakistan and its Army a bad name. The military community is seething with anger as its code of honour:"A cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do" has been violated. The honour code is instilled in the tender minds when the future officers of the army report to the Military Academy as “Gentlemen Cadets”. The operative adjective here is “Gentlemen”. Some misinformed individuals even doubt the judicial capabilities of the Army. All three services have the Judge Advocate General Branch, which is staffed with officers, drawn from the legal community, who are well versed with the civil jurisprudence as well as the Armed Forces Act pertaining to each service. Moreover, the accused being tried in a military court have the option to be represented by civilian counsel.
Last year a financial scandal involving serving officers of the rank of Lieutenant General in the Indian Army was reported widely in the media. The officers were tried in a civilian court and it was being commented that had the case involved Pakistan Army officers, it would have been swept under the carpet. However, by trying the accused officers, Pakistan Army has belied the speculations. It is only hoped that justice will be served and the accused, if proven guilty will be punished accordingly.
Courtesy: Opinion Maker
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements and or information contained in this article.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By
By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam.  Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something els...
2 comments
Read more

Waging war on ourselves

By
BY  ETHAN CASEY A couple of years ago, giving a talk at a church in Seattle, I was conveying as best I could the anger Pakistanis feel toward the US about drone attacks, when a woman raised her hand and asked, “What’s a drone attack?” I give her credit for asking, but I was astounded nonetheless. Ever since then I’ve kept that woman in my mind, and often cited her to audiences, as an example of the ignorance of ordinary Americans about things that are happening – I should say things we’re doing to other people – beyond our shores. My mentor  Clyde Edwin Pettit  used to say that we’re all ignorant, only about different things. That can be a helpful working assumption when trying to achieve common understanding, but it’s also true that some of us are closer than others to the coal face of hard experience. For example, the novelist  John Grisham recently pointed out  that support for the death penalty is “still very much the consensus among white people i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pakistani Pilots in Arab Israel War

By
45 years after the 1967 war: How the Arabs lost Jerusalem War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes gave up their lives for the Arab side during the 1967 Six-Day War. (Image courtesy AP)   By  ALI YOUNES   SPECIAL TO AL ARABIYA This past June marked the 45th anniversary of the Arab defeat of the 1967 war. War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes faithfully gave up their lives for the Arab side, defending the honor of their nations. The actions of those men deserve to be highlighted and explained, especially the contributions of the Pakistani pilot Saiful Azam and the brave Jordanian soldiers of the battle of Ammunition Hill in Jerusalem. At 12:48 p.m. on June 5, four Israeli jets were descending on Jordan’s Mafraq air base to smash the country’s tiny air force, shortly after the entire Egyptian air force had been reduced to rubble.  To intercept the incoming attack, ...
2 comments
Read more