Skip to main content

The Ten Pillars of Justice




By Humayun Gauhar
I talked of seven pillars or cornerstones of justice last Sunday but left out three of the most important for want of space. These are: due process, presumption of innocence, and absence of emotion, making ten pillars in all.
Due process is a fundamental right that includes the right to defence, the right to call witnesses in one’s defence, the right to cross-examine witnesses and the right of appeal. As officers of the court lawyers should know. Yet, amazingly, lawyers, not rabble rousers, screamed at Aitizaz Ahsan for taking the prime minister’s case and Asma Jehangir of Hussain Haqqani. Don’t they have the right to defend themselves? Methinks that in Pakistan lawyers and rabble-rouser are two names for the same profession. If Hitler had been arrested the same rights of due process would have come into play for him as for you and me. What America is doing in Guantanamo and its other concentration camps is an abomination to due process.
So important is due process that even the Almighty deems it necessary to demonstrate that none shall be punished without calling witnesses. Why would God need to do this? Because He wants to impress upon us the importance of due process, so important that even He who knows everything also follows it to satisfy every being that justice has been done to them and they have not been wrongly punished.
“That Day shall We set a seal on their mouths. But their hands will speak To Us, and their feet bear witness, to all that they did.” (Al Quran: XXXVI 65).
“Till, when they reach it (Hell-fire), their hearing (ears) and their eyes, and their skins will testify against them as to what they used to do.” (Al Quran: XLI 20).
God’s witnesses are our skins, hands and feet, our eyes and ears. Frightened? Don’t be, for God is Most Merciful, Most Beneficent. He will be Merciful to us for failing to discharge our duties towards Him – Haqooq Allah – but failing in our duties towards His creations – Haqooq ul Ibad –is another matter. If you are of the An al Haq school of thought like Mansour Hallaj, then you will wonder what this Judgment Day is all about for “I am the Truth” – ‘Hairan hoon phir yeh mushahida hai kis liyay’ – “What is this observation for?” But that will take to me to a whole new realm best left to another time.
Why would human judges sometimes overlook due process? Far be it for me to even suggest that they don’t fear God. Dare I humbly suggest that it could possibly be because of lack of understanding and surfeit of self-importance? They should remember that on the Day of Judgment they would not go to God’s presence in shameful motorcades, sirens blazing, strobe lights flashing.
Presumption of innocence and due process go together. The onus of proof lies on the prosecution, not on the accused. The accused does not have to prove his innocence; rather, those accusing him have to prove his guilt, something that was shamefully overlooked by our National Accountability Bureau initially. The rationale is that it is better to let many go free rather than unjustly punish even one. The enormity of this gets driven home in the case of capital punishment: if you hang one innocent person and later discover that he was innocent, is there any way you can bring him back to life and undo the injustice done to him? If the Supreme Court finds that there was a miscarriage of justice in Mr. Bhutto’s case, who will undo the wrong done him, who will bring him back to life and give him back the 32 years he has spent in the grave?
Even someone unjustly deprived of liberty or reputation cannot be adequately compensated. How do you place a value on life and liberty or any stigma caused by an unfair loss of reputation? That stigma is not only on the person unjustly defamed but on his entire family, which is injustice compounded. In Islam it is the duty of the leader and the state to protect the dignity and reputation of its citizens and their families. Not only do our leaders and state woefully fail in this duty, our media flout it daily with great abandon, but neither our state nor our judiciary take a wit of notice, suo moto forsooth.
Absence of emotion means: don’t hate anyone so much that it prevents you from doing them justice. Nor does it give you the right to take away their right to defend themselves. You, I and the lawyers have the right to accuse anyone provided we have evidence that will stand up in a proper court of law.
“O you who believe, stand out firmly for God, as witnesses to fair dealing and let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. Be just; justice is next to piety.”(V: 9). Naturally, let not your hatred of others prevent you from doing them justice.
“O you who believe, stand out firmly for justice as witnesses to God, even as against yourselves, or your parents, or your kith and kin and whether it be against rich or poor for God can protect both. Follow not the lusts of your hearts lest you swerve and if you distort justice or decline to do justice, verily God is well-acquainted with all that your do.” (IV: 135).
Since most of us are Muslims by accident of birth and take our faith for granted believing what our elders, teachers and clerics tell us while few are Muslims by conviction that comes only from knowledge and understanding, and we have chosen to call our Pakistan an ‘Islamic Republic’, it is useful to remember periodically some of what else God has said about justice and how important it is.
“God commands that when you judge between man and man, judge with justice.” (IV: 135). The word ‘man’ throughout does not refer only to the male gender but to all genders. ‘Man’ is generic for human beings.
“Allah has sent down the Book in truth so that you might judge between men as guided by God.” (IV: 105). Now ‘in truth’ is most interesting, because if the translator has used the word ‘truth’ for ‘Haq’, it takes on a wholly different dimension. But he has not used a capital ‘T’ for it, so perhaps it doesn’t mean ‘Haq’. Why don’t you think about it? Let me just say that ‘Haq’ has different meanings: it is one of God’s names; it means the Truth; it means rights, duties and obligations, as in Haqooq ul Ibad and Haqooq Allah.
“Allah has set up the balance of Justice; so establish justice and fall not short in the balance.”(LV: 7-9). Again, capital ‘J’ for God’s Justice and a small one for man’s justice.
“Allah sent aforetime His Prophets with clear signs and sent down with them the Book and the Balance that men stand forth in Justice.” (LVII: 25).
“We sent down with Our Apostle the Balance of Justice, so that man may stand forth in justice.”(LVII: 25).
There is balance everywhere, in everything. Any wonder that the symbol of temporal justice is a blindfolded lady holding balanced scales, to show that justice is unbiased and evenhanded. Balance is Adl, more than simply justice, though justice is a very important element of balance. If there were no balance in mass, weight, velocity, temperatures, distances, speeds of expansion and God alone knows what else, the universe would collapse. There is balance at quantum levels too. Thus Man is enjoined to maintain balance in his life and in society. An unbalanced society is absence of Adl, where there is no egalitarianism, no distributive justice and vast differences in wealth, power and influence. Absence of Adl means absence of Islam – Peace – God’s Islam, not the cleric’s religions. God help us. 
Courtesy: Opinion Maker
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements and or information contained in this article

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam.  Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something else an

Waging war on ourselves

BY  ETHAN CASEY A couple of years ago, giving a talk at a church in Seattle, I was conveying as best I could the anger Pakistanis feel toward the US about drone attacks, when a woman raised her hand and asked, “What’s a drone attack?” I give her credit for asking, but I was astounded nonetheless. Ever since then I’ve kept that woman in my mind, and often cited her to audiences, as an example of the ignorance of ordinary Americans about things that are happening – I should say things we’re doing to other people – beyond our shores. My mentor  Clyde Edwin Pettit  used to say that we’re all ignorant, only about different things. That can be a helpful working assumption when trying to achieve common understanding, but it’s also true that some of us are closer than others to the coal face of hard experience. For example, the novelist  John Grisham recently pointed out  that support for the death penalty is “still very much the consensus among white people in the South. Black people kno

Muslim Pages on Facebook | What Happened To You ???

I was prompted to highlight this issue because people were going crazy on the social media specially facebook over the blasphemous anti-Islamic film.  Yes, the film is blasphemous and the makers of the film should be punished because there is a clear difference between freedom of speech and hate speech. But the thing that I am going to highlight is the pictures that are being spread all over the facebook, for example have a look at this one: Translates : Hitler writes in his book My Struggle that "If I had wanted I could have killed all the jews of the world but I left a few for the world to know why I killed them" Now, the book My Struggle was published in 1924 and the Holocaust happened in 1930, how could Adolf Hitler wrote about Holocaust six years prior to its happening ? Take a look at this picture:  Does the maker of this photo even know that it was Hitler's holocaust that led the zionists accelerate their activities in getting a homeland ? N