Skip to main content

Pakistan starts boosting trade with India

Pakistan agreed to normalize trading relations with India, a move that may give a boost to moribund talks aimed at improving relations between the hostile South Asian neighbors. Pakistan’s Information...


Pakistan agreed to normalize trading relations with India, a move that may give a boost to moribund talks aimed at improving relations between the hostile South Asian neighbors.
Pakistan’s Information Minister Firdous Ashiq Awan told a news conference Wednesday that Pakistan’s cabinet decided to grant India “Most Favored Nation” status, a decision that will likely boost bilateral trade.
“This was a decision taken in the national interest and all stakeholders, including our military and defense institutions, were on board,” Ms. Awan said.
Under World Trade Organization agreements, the MFN principle is supposed to ensure that WTO members don’t discriminate against one another, allowing all countries in the organization to benefit equally from the lowest possible tariffs.
India granted Pakistan MFN status in the mid-1990s, but Pakistan declined to reciprocate despite its WTO obligations. Both countries are members of the WTO.
Instead, Pakistan has limited imports from India to fewer than 2,000 items. Under the new arrangement, Pakistan will move to a “negative list” of goods—items of strategic importance such as defense equipment—which it will continue to ban, while allowing trade in a wider range of products.
The move is a rare goodwill gesture by Pakistan to India, with which it has fought three wars since 1947, and may help kick-start peace talks that have made little headway in recent years. The two countries have been trying to improve relations through the talks, launched in 2004 but suspended after Pakistani militants attacked Mumbai in 2008, killing more than 160 people.
The discussions started again in earnest in February after India agreed to Pakistan’s demands to broaden discussions to focus on issues such as trade and the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir. India earlier had said it was unwilling to discuss these issues until Pakistan cracked down on militants that threaten India.
Both sides have been focusing on regular meetings of trade bureaucrats as a way to edge the talks forward, rather than hoping for a major breakthrough on more intractable problems like Kashmir, which is divided between India and Pakistan and claimed by both in its entirety.
The trade detente comes as tensions have risen recently over India’s efforts to increase its participation in Afghanistan’s economy, including spending more than $1 billion in aid to improve infrastructure and a recent agreement to train Afghan security forces.
Pakistan considers Afghanistan its backyard and is hoping to play a major role in tentative peace talks between the U.S. and Taliban fighters. It is opposed to India’s rising influence in Afghanistan.
India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has said India won’t achieve its economic potential until it forges peace with Pakistan and opens trade routes toward Afghanistan and Central Asian nations.
Chandrajit Banerjee, director general of the Confederation of Indian Industry, a trade group, said in a statement that Pakistan’s decision to grant MFN status to India will help give a big jump to bilateral trade and pave the way for economic integration of South Asia.
Bilateral trade could jump to $8 billion in five years, he said. But both sides still need to address issues such as the difficulty of obtaining business visas, nontariff barriers to trade and the need to liberalize investment, Mr. Banerjee added.
Some Pakistani politicians had argued that MFN status for India should be linked to the resolution of the Kashmir issue, and the decision to move ahead anyway was a rare bright spot in relations.
Still, Pakistan’s failure to push ahead with the trials of seven Pakistani militants that it has charged in connection with the Mumbai attacks remains a major stumbling block to the overall normalization of relations between the two nations.
It is unclear whether Wednesday’s move will immediately propel trade higher, largely because nontariff barriers to trade, such as onerous labeling requirements, could still make things difficult for exporters. A highly militarized border between the two nations—with only one major overland trade post—is also likely to continue to limit commerce despite moves to expand the capacity of customs facilities at that post.
There is huge room for growth in trade. In the year ended March 31, India exported $2.33 billion of goods to Pakistan. In the same period, Pakistan sold goods valued at $332.5 million in India, according to Indian government statistics.
By comparison, two-way trade between India and China, New Delhi’s largest trading partner, is valued at more than $60 billion annually.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). SPY EYES Analysis and or its affiliates will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements and or information contained in this article. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What about Israel’s nuclear weapons?

By   Patrick B. Pexton Readers periodically ask me some variation on this question: “Why does the press follow every jot and tittle of Iran’s nuclear program, but we never see any stories about Israel’s nuclear weapons capability?” It’s a fair question. Going back 10 years into Post archives, I could not find any in-depth reporting on Israeli nuclear capabilities, although national security writer  Walter Pincus  has touched on it  many times in his articles and  columns . I spoke with several experts in the nuclear and nonproliferation fields , and they say that the lack of reporting on Israel’s nuclear weapons is real — and frustrating. There are some obvious reasons for this, and others that are not so obvious. First, Israel refuses to acknowledge publicly that it has nuclear weapons. The U.S. government also officially does not acknowledge the existence of such a program. Israel’s official position, as reiterated by Aaron Sagui, spokesman fo...

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam.  Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something els...

Pakistani Pilots in Arab Israel War

45 years after the 1967 war: How the Arabs lost Jerusalem War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes gave up their lives for the Arab side during the 1967 Six-Day War. (Image courtesy AP)   By  ALI YOUNES   SPECIAL TO AL ARABIYA This past June marked the 45th anniversary of the Arab defeat of the 1967 war. War is normally measured by its final outcome, but many individual heroes faithfully gave up their lives for the Arab side, defending the honor of their nations. The actions of those men deserve to be highlighted and explained, especially the contributions of the Pakistani pilot Saiful Azam and the brave Jordanian soldiers of the battle of Ammunition Hill in Jerusalem. At 12:48 p.m. on June 5, four Israeli jets were descending on Jordan’s Mafraq air base to smash the country’s tiny air force, shortly after the entire Egyptian air force had been reduced to rubble.  To intercept the incoming attack, ...