Skip to main content

BBC has more doubtful credibility now after Sam Collyn’s bluff on 26th October 2011 about Pakistan.


By Sabrina Baloch

The Program Ran by Sam Collyns on 26th October 2011 “Afghanistan: Pakistan accused of backing Taliban” was another fake propaganda generated by western media while BBC was always considered a neutral news provider have been infested by fake logics and themes.


Over here I will expose their propaganda point wise in replies to the quotes of Program with the inclusion of the snapshot.



1.       “In a prison cell on the outskirts of Kabul, the Afghan Intelligence Service is holding a young man who alleges he was recruited earlier this year by Pakistan's powerful military intelligence agency, the ISI.”

a.       He does not look alike to Taliban as Taliban’s are mostly composed of Pashtun fiction who are very well against northern alliance uzbek, tajik n other fictions (See above snapshot)
2.       He says he was trained to be a suicide bomber in the Taliban's intensifying military campaign against the Western coalition forces - and preparations for his mission were overseen by an ISI officer in a camp in Pakistan.

a.       15days Training? A person cannot be considered well trained as salesman so how can you train a suicide bomber in 15Days? 2nd making someone to do suicide bombing needs a brainwash psychological work which cannot be done as “quick hire & fast deploy strategy”.
3.       Mumbai Attacks

a.       It is well exposed that Mumbai Attacks were inside Job and media manipulation controlled by western interests whether of Pakistan or Foreign (SNAP SHOTS)
4.       Pakistan support to Taliban

a.       5 Army Brigades deployed in North Waziristan to control cross border activities that mean 25000, regular army is in that agency. Are they on picnic or to stop such activities?
b.      Then why Taliban’s are attacking Pakistan Army?
c.       Most importantly that no low ranking or middle ranking can even know what happens on high level and this simple principal applies in any organization.
5.       “At the beginning of the drone operations, we gave Pakistan an advance tip-off of where we were going, and every single time the target wasn’t there anymore.

a.       So what about Naik Mohd ? Why he was not saved by ISI, as this was the second drone attack on Pakistan and as per BBC program initially tip offs were given to ISI, moreover Naik Muhammad was on the verge of meeting a peace treaty for Pakistan.
6.      Bin Laden was killed how?

a.       Declaration on May Day?
b.      When Obama was caught on certificate issues (Snap Shots / Video Links)
7       ISI does not want peace in Afghanistan

a.       How can Pakistan with un employment rate, power crisis, democratic government In infancy, with hot eastern border can afford a proxy war against sole super power and 43 Nation’s Army composed of 285,000/- Active soldiers on Western Border? Isn’t it a logical point then the story telling of BBC?
b.      ISI and Pakistan Army met with uniform. Ridiculous ISI doesn’t have any uniform and how childish is that Pakistan Army comes openly in uniform to say we are supporting them with inclusion of ISI?
Conclusion:
Above facts dose prove that WEST (USA & NATO) is in so hurry to build a false case against Pakistan even with fake news and propaganda. I would request BBC people that kindly do your homework well before hitting my country again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan can never be Madina E Saani

By Nadeem Sajjad. Pakistan is a land loved by many and lived in by millions. It has been witnessed in the past --and somewhat in the present age – that the origin of the name (word) “Pakistan” has had many different accounts of its creators/inventors. Known to be the most accurate of all accounts, is the one of the much respected Chaudhry Rehmat Ali. Others have the concept that the word “Pakistan” was given to the Muslims of India, after the success of Lahore resolution in 1940, by the Hindus of the subcontinent and was then used by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah in his presidential address to the All India Muslim League annual session at Delhi on 24 April 1943. Whatever may be the origin, the Muslims got their own land to practice their religion Islam, and to maintain their traditions. The thing that should be emphasized upon is that the country was created in the name of Islam.  Knowing the origin is one thing, but naming the country or the name itself to something else an

Waging war on ourselves

BY  ETHAN CASEY A couple of years ago, giving a talk at a church in Seattle, I was conveying as best I could the anger Pakistanis feel toward the US about drone attacks, when a woman raised her hand and asked, “What’s a drone attack?” I give her credit for asking, but I was astounded nonetheless. Ever since then I’ve kept that woman in my mind, and often cited her to audiences, as an example of the ignorance of ordinary Americans about things that are happening – I should say things we’re doing to other people – beyond our shores. My mentor  Clyde Edwin Pettit  used to say that we’re all ignorant, only about different things. That can be a helpful working assumption when trying to achieve common understanding, but it’s also true that some of us are closer than others to the coal face of hard experience. For example, the novelist  John Grisham recently pointed out  that support for the death penalty is “still very much the consensus among white people in the South. Black people kno

Muslim Pages on Facebook | What Happened To You ???

I was prompted to highlight this issue because people were going crazy on the social media specially facebook over the blasphemous anti-Islamic film.  Yes, the film is blasphemous and the makers of the film should be punished because there is a clear difference between freedom of speech and hate speech. But the thing that I am going to highlight is the pictures that are being spread all over the facebook, for example have a look at this one: Translates : Hitler writes in his book My Struggle that "If I had wanted I could have killed all the jews of the world but I left a few for the world to know why I killed them" Now, the book My Struggle was published in 1924 and the Holocaust happened in 1930, how could Adolf Hitler wrote about Holocaust six years prior to its happening ? Take a look at this picture:  Does the maker of this photo even know that it was Hitler's holocaust that led the zionists accelerate their activities in getting a homeland ? N